Regulatory Playbook | Pillsbury Law | Energy and Climate Change | Insights
Regulatory Playbook
Inside analysis direct from Washington, DC
This links to the home page
Topics

Energy and Climate Change

  • Senate Votes to Advance the Big, Beautiful Bill – Latest on Renewable Energy Tax Credits
    06.30/Alert

    On June 28, 2025, the Senate voted 51-49 to advance its version of the Big, Beautiful Bill (the “Bill” or “BBB”). As relates to renewable energy tax credits enacted by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), the Senate’s version of the Bill differs in some significant respects from the version released by the Senate Finance Committee (SFC) on June 16, 2025, as summarized below. Our prior client alert discusses the differences in impact on renewable energy tax credits between the SFC version of the Bill and the version approved by the House of Representatives on May 22, 2025.

  • SCOTUS Affirms Rules for Challenging Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licenses
    06.26/Alert

    In Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas, a 6-3 decision authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Interim Storage Partners, LLC (ISP) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The case concerned the NRC’s issuance of a license to ISP to build and operate a private away-from-reactor spent nuclear fuel storage facility in West Texas, an action the Fifth Circuit had invalidated as beyond the agency’s statutory authority.

  • Status Update: Renewable Energy Tax Credits Under the Big Beautiful Bill
    06.23/Alert

    With the Senate Finance Committee (SFC) releasing the text of its version of the Big Beautiful Bill (the “Bill” or “BBB”) on June 16, 2025, we provide a comparison of the competing proposals from the House and the SFC. In short, the House version of the BBB featured three principal changes to the renewable energy tax credit provisions enacted under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA): (i) accelerated expiration dates and phase-outs, (ii) repeal of cash transfer elections and (iii) imposition of limitations for associations with FEOCs. The SFC version of the BBB, in turn, (i) eases some of the expiration dates and phase-outs, (ii) allows cash transfer elections to continue for the remaining periods of tax credit availability and (iii) provides important guidance on the restrictions relating to FEOCs.

  • Texas Signals Its Commitment to Leading America’s Nuclear Energy Future Through Industry-Friendly Legislation
    06.11/Alert

    Texas emerged from its 89th legislative session with a sweeping set of laws aimed at cementing the state’s leadership in advanced nuclear energy. Through the passage of HB 14, SB 1535 and SB 1061, lawmakers demonstrated a commitment to developing a robust nuclear ecosystem backed by regulatory reform, significant public investment and a forward-looking workforce strategy. This legislative package signals not only Texas’s confidence in nuclear power as a cornerstone of its future energy mix, but also its intent to create a nationally competitive environment for innovation and growth in the nuclear sector.

  • Water, Reused: Texas Reshapes Liability and Regulatory Rules on Produced Water, Leaves Ownership Questions Unanswered
    06.09/Alert

    The Texas Legislature passed a series of bills aimed at modernizing the legal and regulatory landscape for the handling and reuse of produced water—a byproduct of oil and gas operations. These developments address permitting, liability and inspection processes, with a focus on clarifying the respective roles and responsibilities among operators and regulators. The following update outlines key enacted and pending measures that are expected to influence compliance obligations, operational planning and strategic decisions related to produced water management across the state. Further, by promoting reuse, the legislation also supports efforts to ease pressure on Texas’s strained water supply, particularly in drought-prone and energy-intensive regions. However, legislation that would have clarified ownership of brine minerals failed to advance, leaving unresolved questions over who owns both brine minerals and produced water—an issue with growing importance as interest increases in extracting critical minerals like lithium from these resources.

  • Texas SB6 Establishes New Transmission Fees and Interconnection Standards for Large Load Customers and Co-Located Loads
    06.09/Alert

    On June 1, 2025, Texas Senate Bill 6 (SB 6), passed both chambers of the Legislature with bipartisan support and was sent to Governor Abbott for signature. Absent a veto by Gov. Abbott, the bill will become effective on September 1, 2025. SB 6 introduces significant changes to how large electricity users interact with the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) grid and marks a notable shift in regulatory policy to address concerns over grid reliability and cost allocations.

  • SCOTUS Limits Scope of NEPA Reviews, Reinstates Approval of Uinta Basin Railway
    06.02/Alert

    In a highly anticipated decision for project developers and permitting agencies, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit’s 2023 decision that had invalidated federal approval of the Uinta Basin Railway. In Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, No. 23-975, ___ U.S. ___ (May 29, 2025), the Supreme Court clarified the limits of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), reaffirming its procedural role and reenforcing the deference owed to agency judgments regarding the scope of environmental reviews.

  • President Trump’s Nuclear Executive Orders: What Clients Should Know
    05.23/Alert

    Today, President Trump signed four new Executive Orders (the “Orders”)—Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy, Reinvigorating the Nuclear Industrial Base, and an order focused on Nuclear Energy for National Security—with a goal to quadruple U.S. nuclear power capacity by 2040. The overall goal of the Orders is to “expedite and promote to the fullest possible extent the production and operation of nuclear energy,”, which matches previous statements by Secretary of Energy Chris Wright that “America must lead the commercialization of affordable and abundant nuclear energy.”

  • State Climate Laws and Litigation Face Federal Pushback Under New Executive Order
    04.18/Alert

    On April 8, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14260, Protecting American Energy From State Overreach. Framed as part of the Administration’s broader strategy of unleashing American energy, the Order directs federal agencies to eliminate what it calls “illegitimate impediments” posed by state and local governments to the production, development and use of traditional energy resources—oil, natural gas, coal, hydropower, geothermal, biofuel, critical minerals and nuclear energy.

  • U.S. Department of Energy Reopens Funding Initiative for Gen III+ Small Modular Reactors with Key Modifications Reflecting Trump Administration Priorities
    04.07/Alert

    On March 24, 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reopened its funding initiative for Generation III+ Small Modular Reactors (Gen III+ SMRs) with modifications aligned with the Trump administration’s policy priorities and energy policy objectives. The modified funding initiative focuses on regulatory streamlining, deregulation and the acceleration of energy infrastructure, while deprioritizing community-based initiatives. As part of this shift, DOE has removed requirements related to community engagement and workforce equity and clarified that award selection will be based solely on technical merit.

  • The Battle Over Climate Superfund Laws: Legal Challenges in Vermont and New York
    04.04/Alert

    States are increasingly turning to “Climate Superfund” laws as a potential mechanism to offset the growing costs of climate-related disaster recovery and the construction of more climate change-resilient infrastructure. These laws aim to hold select energy companies financially responsible for infrastructure resiliency investments and climate-related damages based on prior greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, they raise significant constitutional questions, particularly concerning state authority over global and interstate climate issues and the retroactive imposition of liability for past, lawful activities. The first two states to enact such laws—Vermont and New York—are already defending them in court against challenges rooted in federal preemption and constitutional limitations.

  • EPA Announces Sweeping Deregulatory Agenda: The Complete Set of EPA’s 31 Actions and Affected Environmental Regulations
    04.03/Alert

    In what it called “the greatest and most consequential day of deregulation in U.S. history,” the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its most expansive deregulatory initiative to date on March 12, 2025. Through a series of press releases and a public address by Administrator Lee Zeldin, the agency outlined 31 planned actions aimed at rescinding, revising or reconsidering existing environmental rules and policies. Each of the press releases, as well as the underlying regulations at issue, are linked below.

  • SEC Ends Its Climate-Related Disclosure Requirements
    04.01/Alert

    On March 6, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules imposing new climate-related disclosure requirements on domestic and foreign registrants with respect to their annual reports and registration statements (Rules). Compliance was set to begin as early as the annual reports for December 31, 2025, for calendar-year-end issuers classified as large-accelerated filers.

  • Council on Environmental Quality Rescinds NEPA Regulations
    03.07/Alert

    As was widely anticipated, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) recently rescinded its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementing regulations, eliminating the uniform framework that has governed NEPA compliance for decades. CEQ’s Interim Final Rule, published on February 25, 2025, removes 40 C.F.R. Parts 1500–1508 from the Code of Federal Regulations, dismantling longstanding procedural requirements for federal environmental reviews.

  • EPA Finalizes New Rule to Reduce and Reclaim Hydrofluorocarbons
    02.11/Alert

    Prior to the Biden administration leaving office, EPA finalized another rule in its continued push to phase down the use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) by issuing a final rule on October 11, 2024, to establish the HFC Emissions Reduction and Reclamation (ER&R) program. EPA’s new rule, discussed in more detail below, will significantly impact industries that rely heavily on commercial-scale refrigeration systems. Further, companies with facilities that rely on older systems may require more frequent equipment repair or replacement to comply with the rule.

  • New ASTM Standard Aims to Facilitate Assessing Climate Risk and Resilience Considerations
    01.28/Alert

    Owners, lenders and investors in real property have long relied on ASTM E 1527-21, a product of ASTM International, in connection with Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. This product is used to establish that “all appropriate inquiries,” as defined at 42 CFR § 9601(35)(B) and 40 CFR § 312.20(a), have been met in connection with a property. As a matter of law, the performance of an ASTM-compliant Phase I ESA enables prospective purchasers and lessees to satisfy one of the criteria for statutory protections against liability for pre-existing environmental conditions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. It also constitutes an indicia that appropriate environmental due diligence has been performed regarding the property.